The Graham Company

http://www.chappelletheory.com/

Although I don’t know enough about this to forge my opinion, I will say that I’ve heard this theory fro a number of sources. Though it is rather dramatic to call this group of figures “the Black Guardians”, the possible motivation and ability of such a group of people do dethrone Chappelle is not at all difficult to suppose.
The idea that this theory was concocted by some “racist white guy” seems more implausible, to me, than the theory itself. Most of the overt racists I’ve met have been simply too naive to know anything more about the people mentioned than the fact they are black, and that they are somehow influential. I will say however, if this alliance really did orchestrate the end of Dave, that a group of really evil guys allowed it to happen. Because there is nothing those bastards like more than to see people argue about benign conspiracies, or argue about racism, while they keep making trips to the bank with wheelbarrows full of money stolen from every race, creed, color, tint, or hue.

http://i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=15001

Good article, even if it is a little presumptuous that we should be turned-off by all the different incarnations of “meat by-product”. If you look at it objectively, you’ll admire the lack of waste enjoyed by the food “manufacturing” industry. Really, the only ones we have to blame for the scarcity of so-called “real food” is ourselves. We’ve continued to reproduce to the point where we’ve been successively staying ahead of the food production curve, to the end that we constantly find our favorite foods in short supply (and therefore overpriced).
Of coarse all this growth is good for business, so I would suppose that our corporate masters have had a hand in excellerating this growth trend. Oh, I know, there are those butt-heads out there that would point out that the US is actually shrinking. Unfortunately the “every family producing 1.5 children on average” statistic, is nothing but an old wives tale. The fact is, the only thing that is occurring, is that our RATE of growth is slowing. We are still growing far too fast. Just look at Europe. If Europe had shared our wanton urge to produce offspring than there wouldn’t be a single undeveloped patch of land in the whole sub-continent.
In any case, this is what some of us HAVE to eat. And more of us will HAVE to eat it as time wears on. And as time wears on some of us will HAVE to eat worse things.
And no amount of conservation will reverse the trend. No amount of forest, ocean, water, wildlife, marinelife, grain, or any other conservation will reverse the trend. Even if they turn to culturing the meat itself in huge vats, or if we turn to eating kelp or algae, this too will be futile. When every man on this planet gets only one gallon of water to use a day, our numbers will still grow to the point where that gallon is required for two men, and so on, until there simply isn’t enough water anymore. Conservation is only a way of slowing down the inevitable. Eventually it will come down to population control.
Another frightening thing about the failure of conservation is that scarcity of something relates directly to that item’s inherent value. Many of these resources that we hear about being wasted, our forests, our clean water, our land, our petroleum; Many of these things are being wasted or destroyed on purpose, and for the express reason of driving up the value of these things. It sounds oxymoronic, I know, but it is a time tested business practice.
For instance: I own huge number of petrol wells. Petrol is relatively plentiful. Because of this, the price I have to sell it at is pretty low. Now if I decide to do something to destroy the petrol of my competitors, or in the very least prevent them from pumping it; there is suddenly less petrol available for purchase, therefor causing the value to climb significantly. Now I can sell MY petrol for a higher price.
It’s evil. But these are the kinds of decisions men can make when they are a part of a group, and do not feel individually accountable for their participation. The guilt is diffused. And specifically, the groups I’m referring to are boards of directors for large corporations.

Untitled Document

http://www.continuitystudios.net/pangea.html

This “4 to 1” weight ratio between the combined mass of the continents and the same geographic area’s worth of ocean mass would do little to offset the gravitational pull of the earth or it’s rotational axis. The entire surface of the earth, from the highest reaches of the stratosphere down to the lowest depths of the deepest ocean trench, doesn’t compose a tenth of a percent of the total mass of the planet.
Let me put this into idiot terms: If the earth really were a globe that you could pick up and look at, the size of a beach-ball. All of the mountains and geographic extremes that we find so incredible would be scarcely perceivable to our fingertips. Whatever activity is taking place on the surface is infinitely less significant than the fleas on the back of a dog. Less significant than the bacteria in that flea’s gut.

Now back to Mr. Neal Adams. Does anyone know who this guy is? Must be some brilliant geologist right? No. He’s a comic book artist. And does anyone know what he believes is the true nature of the earth? That it’s hollow… AND IT’S GROWING! Maybe thats where he was able to presume the continents all being piled on one side would screw up the rotation. The hollow earth. A concept that spits in the face of every law of physics. This guy isn’t a geologist. Just a dick that has no idea (or desire to understand) how things work and would rather make up crap like this.
Next!
UPDATE: IF you really want to know just how disturbingly dumb this guy is I invite you to see his explanation of how Mars is growing. http://www.continuitystudios.net/marsmov02.html
I warn you though, if you find this plausable it may be that you are not too strong in science and not due to actual plausability.
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

TheBest-Horror-Movies.com Top 100 Horror Movies List 2007 – PrinterFriendly

http://www.best-horror-movies.com/top-100-horror-movies-printer-friendly.html

The proper page to view this list at is http://www.best-horror-movies.com/top-100-horror-movies.html
Thumbs up for mentioning some good flicks that are so obscure that I forgot that I saw them. But I’ve got a beef with this list:
I know I’m against horror movie dogma when I say that I don’t think The Exorcist deserves the number one spot in a list of greatest horror movies. How do you like that? I think the Exorcist was good, but light years from a great horror flick. I don’t care about how “revolutionary” it was when it came out, etc, etc. I don’t know why, but I find nothing frightening about a restrained little girl shouting obcinities. Arousing maybe, frightening never….(I’m kidding assholes) But frankly I am sick of lists like this that cop out and name the same movies as every similar list out there.
What’s that you say? Who do I think the greatest horror movie was? Think you’re going to catch me with my pants down? HA! I’ll have you know that whenever I’m sitting at my computer, my pants are not only down, but completely off!
Anyhow my answer is The Thing (1982). OK, this is easily the finest production that John Carpenter ever made. This movie was a horror suspense thriller of a movie and boasted great acting, great cinematography, and the stop action special effects are of a caliber that I have never seen equaled. Even against today’s seamless computer effects, the stop action photography not only still competes, it actually supersedes most of the best stuff produced today.
There is allot in this movie that is so disturbing, I think it must trigger some kind of genetic memory of terror, because even after seeing it a half dozen times, certain scenes still fill me with dread. Yet it is strangely watchable. Unlike most films with this level of creep factor that just make you want to turn off the DVD player; there are enough elements of this story that keep you watching… UNABLE TO TURN IT OFF and therefore seat-belted in and unable to bail out.
Plus, where else are you going to see a Wilford Brimley sans mustache?